Explore
Gaia Soulmates
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?

Walking -- Henry David Thoreau as a blog title

Posted on Apr 11th, 2009 by Michael  : Computerless Michael
Blog9
Today I noticed that a blog I had posted titled Walking -- Henry David Thoreau, had nearly ten times the "views" than my other blogs.  So I'm wondering if it's some search feature, or perhaps somewhere there is a page where the titles of "Latest Blogs On Gaia" are shown and Thoreau fans are clicking away. 

   "Separate each tag with a comma: love, life, living large"

is displayed at the bottom of the blog entry page.  Each time I see it I want to write a blog RE: "living large." 

This reminds me of a friend who said I have "big energy."   It's the kind that works wonders when I'm leading something, when I feel juicy, and also the same feel when running sessions.  That is, leading satsang.  Sharing with others deeply.  Though I should add that the energy if more like "full" like a wonderful all-encompassing wave of love, that version of "living large."  I think it is "Big Energy" form when I post in disucssion areas views which are contrary or even startling.  .. . .  ..

Wait!  I just got something.  The fact is that I hold back my energy a lot and I'm sure some of the time, that it is exactly the holding-back which others can feel and so when I'm even partly disturbing, my unstated holding back is added upon and I (whatever I wrote) becomes alarming to people.  I see this.  I can see that happening.  I'm bringing it about by my holding back, and how can others who only "feel" this know that I'm not being secretive or ironic or something?  That can't of course.  They can only know the words I offer, what I actually type.

There is one identity which I'd be really good at, but would never ever fully take on, and that is being like Jesus rampaging amongst the money-changers at the temple.  It's not self-righteousness, it is merely heart-felt expression that shouts down the selfish, the greedy, the arrogant. It is not judging others, with something like, "You are a fool!"  But is more like, "Do not lie to me!"   Or gently, though just as powerful, "can't you see how close you are if you only gave yourself the chance?"

Instead of living that large, my wittle ego likes to think of myself as having Buddhic thundering silence.

But thundering silence conveys nothing to people, like you, who cannot see me.  So there's my challenge, huh?  How to live large without misplaced Big Energy.  I hasten to highlight "misplaced" here because indeed there are times for it, like cheering at a Patriots football game, although people who live in cities who have other teams, well, there is enough pity for them already, so I will not heap upon it here. 

So.  I've been saying for a while now (as if someone in the universe is actually paying attention to me(!)) that what I'd really like to be doing is satsang events/sessions, and the reason is I love the flow, the energy, the waves of loving energy that we exchange when barriers fall away.  Such sweet gosh heart-filled energy.  There are no words.  

That is the one "living large" and all the energy flow it entails, which I am most comfortable with.  In satsang, which I will likely never ever do again.

But like I said above, that's much like "living large."  

Let me look at these.

Living Large.

Big Energy.

and that amazing world-filling flow of love that happens in satsang. 

Well, that last one I can see where it fits, as I've said, but the first two, hummm... I wonder what I can do to integrate them deliberately into my life.  It sure would be nice or, fun, to have a worldly identity again.  Often I feel positively trapped in my body when I go up into my head thinking I'm doing something wrong.  But really, hermitting is not something I was designed for - - human beings are social critters and it's past time for me to re-engage in, hah, I cannot even say "society", I need to say something like, "re-engage socially" which doesn't commit me to society at large. 

 

I notice: my big energy scares me.  I don't have the skills to back it up.  When someone really stands up, some joker must jump up and start head-banging.  Usually someone like me, I add ruefully.  I don't want to be playing that game.  I do have the skills to head-bang back, what I meant about lack of skills was staying humble in the face of arrogance while I too am speaking up, being clear, living (only as) large as I actually am. 

But even that is not true.  I've seen myself do it.  I've helped people being attacked, for instance.  No, there is something here I'm not seeing in myself.  It is something like not believing in myself enough. . . . or . . .  a light is starting to gleam . . . it is not having my own and other support.  It is . . . it is not being willing to live large "from outside", that is, I must really truly be engaged before I feel comfortable accepting the support of others in "large" endevours that involve others.  And it's right here that I hit the wall.  Because I'm awake, I'm smart, and I only lead when I'm the only one who can.  And socially people bridle at someone who thinks he's smarter, or more enlightened, any of that, whether or not that's what I think of myself.  When I live large, I open myself to that stuff, and I feel sad, dragged down into the attacker's own suffering and I can't live large then, on his level, which is butting heads.  This is it, right here.  This is my issue.  I'm sitting right in it.  And I do not know where to turn. 

 

Access_public Access: Public 7 Comments Print views (88)  
 Meenakshi : Connection
about 18 hours later
Meenakshi said

Thoreau Michael, really enjoyable. Well, I did come here because of Thoreau in the other blog and then came on here for an explanation that I found. But I'm still tempted to say - it's okay to let Thoreau be now. Michael will do nicely, I think. Perhaps a title like “Michael says..”?

People not reading - or not commenting after reading – a blog is quite similar to people not buying after seeing a book or an ad or whatever; or even, replying to a letter.

But it helps if you go out and read and comment too. Do you? [scurrying to anchor down my blogs in case Big Energy comes by] ;0

Sandra : Inspirational Ambassador
2 days later
Sandra said

:-) nice to see you 'active' Michael. And big YES to Meenakshi re getting some comments: it helps if you go out and read and comment too…
xo

Michael  : Computerless
2 days later
Michael said

Thank you, Sandra, and thank you, Meenakshi. 

Although I'm something conscious of the difference between someone “buying the book” (enough to comment on my content), and socializing.  I think I've got some kind of block about being seen for who I am, my content, and feeling that surface-level friendship is, what?  “shallow”?  I know this sounds of existential angst, which is maybe where I am, back in high school!? 
What it feels like, it feels like I was burned re: socializing. 

I experienced some kind of profound deep thing some years ago and since then I've been stuck right exactly on some parallel of Comments !  Far out.[!]  I know what it was that bumped me, it was rejection.  And it's not that I need praising comments, but it's something like that, in this area.  It's like Comments are … maybe that I'm real. 

Well.  I didn't expect to type that

Sandra : Inspirational Ambassador
3 days later
Sandra said

the way I see it is: if you feel you have something to share to others, it behooves (sp?) you to simply make what you have said 'available'. If this means making oneself a bit 'known' to others by commenting on their blogs or joining a pod  (how about Nicole's Is there a God Pod?) and chatting…. then so be it :-)

 Meenakshi : Connection
5 days later
Meenakshi said

  I think I've got some kind of block about being seen for who I am, my
content, and feeling that surface-level friendship is, what?  “shallow”

It's not even friendship; I'm just suggesting a connection of thoughts; not people.You read someone's words, say your thoughts and they just might click on yours; or not. But you may be surprised by how much fun it is.
At which point you could go into hermit and writing only mode for a while!

Michael  : Computerless
5 days later
Michael said

Thank you Meenakshi,

I'm feeling I'm getting the drift of it …  and taking the word Hermit off my Profile, as that time seems to be up (over).  :-) 

The back of my mind seems to be re-collecting social interaction stuff, including moderating forums issues, and such, so it seems my social-ness is coming alive, we'll see.  Though I don't think it will be Big Energy, nor will friends need to batten down their blogs.  *grin*

debyemm : Tree Hugging Dirt Worshiper
6 days later
debyemm said

Michael,

It takes courage to be authentic.  I understand big energy, it feels like “heat” to me, like I'm going through a hot flash, which fortunately I've had only the one or two memorable experiences with - hot flashes, I mean.  Energy, though, I feel much more often.

Some will resonate with you, either in actuality or pretense.  It is nice to be affirmed.  I grow more from the ones who admit they don't resonate with me.  Of course, at first, there is the searching of self, all that second-guessing - did I “miss” something obvious to others?  Were some made uncomfortable by my words and so, wish to silence me for their own comfort?  Do some see me as suffering and that suffering pains them?  Are some judging me by their standards, which I don't resonate with?  That is my first phase of engaging with others when the big energy is less than comfortable.  Determining that I really am, exactly as I should be, and that others are the doing same as well.

Then, I look into my heart.  In other words, am I being authentic but am I considering other's feelings, as well?  Should I consider their feelings?  My answer is usually “yes”, I should consider their feelings but that does not mean I should shirk from a task that has been given to me.  Can I do that task gently, and will doing it gently, be best for the other person, perhaps not.  Will it be good enough for what I need?  Perhaps it would still be good enough, and I could take the other's feelings into consideration.  What was my intent, at the time I first wrote, whatever launched that intense wave of energy?  That is very helpful because the second guessing may muddy my rememberance, that my intent was innocent, however it all unfolded after that.

Was I actually bothered?, and it showed, even if I attempt to hide that from myself?  Sometimes that is the truth.  Was it interpreted by another as an attack (even though it wasn't intended, to be one, by my own self) because they felt some guilt, about whatever words or actions of their own, prompted my comment?  Are they taking what I'm saying, meant to be interpreted in the context of a larger view, too personally?  Gosh, I'm guilty of doing that, in response to other's words, all too often my self.

It's okay to be alone with one self and contemplate one's own nature.  Not engaging with others is like living without a mirror in one's home.  Yet, one need not look in the mirror all the time, even if they have access to one.  Often, the volume of comments or interaction is not a measurement of “worth” (the absence of such may actually be a measurement of affirmation or the desire not to get into a confrontation).  It may not be anything “personal” at all.  It may only be the difficult managing of limited time, on the part of the reader.  That is most often the case with my own self.

I've enjoyed these 2 blogs, for what it's worth -
Deb

You have to be a Gaia member to post comments.
Login or Join now!